Betashares 2028 Fixed Term Corporate Bond Active ETF vs Betashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
28BB and QPON are both Bonds ETFs. Both charge 0.22% p.a. Holdings overlap is approximately 11% estimated (top 16 holdings).
Betashares 2028 Fixed Term Corporate Bond Active ETF
BetaShares
Betashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
There is no single "better" fund here - which suits you depends on your goals. The clearest differences between 28BB and QPON:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.22% p.a.
QPON is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
28BB spreads exposure across more holdings (28BB 50, QPON 14); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
28BB distributes approximately 4.1% and QPON approximately 4.4%; QPON carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: top 16 holdings.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
28BB top holdings
QPON top holdings
Sector weights for 28BBare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
28BB sectors
QPON sectors
Geographic weights for 28BBare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
28BB geography
QPON geography
There is no single right choice between 28BB and QPON - it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. The key differences between the two funds are summarised near the top of this page, with the full side-by-side data below.
28BB and QPON have approximately 11% estimated holdings overlap (top 16 holdings). This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists.
28BB and QPON charge the same management fee of 0.22% per year.
28BB (Betashares 2028 Fixed Term Corporate Bond Active ETF) manages approximately $5.93M and QPON (Betashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF) manages approximately $2.0B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 11% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. 28BB charges 0.22% and QPON charges 0.22%, the same management fee, and they have approximately 11% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
28BB full profile →QPON full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →