Global X AI Infrastructure ETF vs Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap.
Scored across Cost (43.8%), Fund size (25%), Holdings breadth (31.3%). Past performance is excluded.
See full breakdown ↓Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
AINF and MNRS are both Thematic ETFs. Both charge 0.57% p.a. A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair.
Global X AI Infrastructure ETF
Global X
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
AINF and MNRS suit different goals rather than one being "better" than the other. The clearest differences:
Green highlights the leading comparison score, the factually lower fee, or the higher scale or income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures and the ASX Investment Products report. Fund size, yield, return and holdings figures each state the date they are as at; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Cost (management fee): Both charge about 0.57% p.a.
Fund size (assets): MNRS is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
Holdings breadth: MNRS spreads exposure across more holdings (AINF 30, MNRS 47); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
General information only, not financial advice. ETFLens does not hold an AFSL. Always read the relevant PDS and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser.
Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. MNRS yield as at 30 Sep 2026. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns or distributions.
Returns as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. Listed top holdings as at 29 Oct 2026 for both funds.
AINF top holdings
MNRS top holdings
Sector weights for AINF are approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
AINF sectors
MNRS sectors
Geographic weights for AINF are approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
AINF geography
MNRS geography
AINF and MNRS can each make sense depending on your objectives, horizon and existing portfolio. The key differences are near the top of this page, and the full side-by-side data is below.
AINF and MNRS do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page.
AINF and MNRS charge the same management fee of 0.57% per year.
AINF (Global X AI Infrastructure ETF) manages approximately $201.51M and MNRS (Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF) manages approximately $255.91M. Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
AINF and MNRS do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. AINF charges 0.57% and MNRS charges 0.57%, the same management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only. This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
AINF full profile →MNRS full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →