Betashares Asia Technology Tigers ETF vs Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
ASIA and MNRS are both Thematic ETFs. ASIA tracks the Solactive Asia ex-Japan Technology and Internet Tigers Index and MNRS tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (Hedged into AUD). MNRS has the lower management fee (0.57% vs 0.67% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 0% (full holdings data).
Betashares Asia Technology Tigers ETF
BetaShares
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
There is no single "better" fund here - which suits you depends on your goals. The clearest differences between ASIA and MNRS:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
MNRS has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
ASIA is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
ASIA and MNRS offer similar breadth of exposure.
ASIA distributes approximately 0.7% and MNRS approximately 0.2%; ASIA carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
ASIA top holdings
MNRS top holdings
Based on each fund's most recently published sector and geographic weightings; figures are approximate. Full breakdowns are shown below.
ASIA sectors
MNRS sectors
ASIA geography
MNRS geography
There is no single right choice between ASIA and MNRS - it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. The key differences between the two funds are summarised near the top of this page, with the full side-by-side data below.
ASIA and MNRS have approximately 0% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered low overlap.
MNRS has the lower management fee. ASIA charges 0.67% per year ($67 per year on a $10,000 investment) and MNRS charges 0.57% per year ($57 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $10 per year per $10,000 invested.
ASIA (Betashares Asia Technology Tigers ETF) manages approximately $1.3B and MNRS (Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF) manages approximately $248.9M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. ASIA charges 0.67% and MNRS charges 0.57%, so MNRS has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
ASIA full profile →MNRS full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →