Betashares S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF vs iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF
BetaShares
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
ATEC and GLIN are both Thematic ETFs: ATEC tracks the and GLIN tracks the . GLIN has the lower management fee (0.15% vs 0.48% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 0% estimated (top 46 holdings). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
ATEC charges 0.48% p.a. and GLIN charges 0.15% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
ATEC manages $558.28M and GLIN manages $1.6B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
ATEC holds 46 positions and GLIN holds 157; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
ATEC distributes approximately 3.21% (Quarterly) and GLIN approximately 2.35% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period ATEC returned 7.4% and GLIN returned 10.8%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: top 46 holdings. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
ATEC top holdings
GLIN top holdings
Sector weights for ATECare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
ATEC sectors
GLIN sectors
Geographic weights for ATECare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
ATEC geography
GLIN geography
ATEC scores 5.1/10 and GLIN scores 6.6/10 on this comparison. GLIN has the higher overall comparison score.
ATEC may suit investors who: investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
GLIN may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
ATEC and GLIN have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap (top 46 holdings). This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
GLIN has the lower management fee. ATEC charges 0.48% per year ($48 per year on a $10,000 investment) and GLIN charges 0.15% per year ($15 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $33 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
ATEC (Betashares S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF) manages approximately $558.28M and GLIN (iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) manages approximately $1.6B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. ATEC charges 0.48% and GLIN charges 0.15%, so GLIN has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
ATEC full profile →GLIN full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →