Global X Australian Bank Credit ETF vs Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
These ETFs invest in different asset classes (shares vs bonds). They are unlikely to share holdings. General information only.
BANK may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions. CRED may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. These funds invest in different markets, so the expected overlap is approximately 0%.
Global X Australian Bank Credit ETF
Global X
Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
BANK and CRED are both Bonds ETFs: BANK tracks the and CRED tracks the Solactive Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond Select TR Index. Both charge 0.25% p.a. A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.25% p.a. in management fees.
BANK manages $185.04M and CRED manages $1.8B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
BANK holds 137 positions and CRED holds 62; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
BANK distributes approximately 3.98% (Monthly) and CRED approximately 5.2% (Monthly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period BANK returned 4.2% and CRED returned 1.0%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
BANK top holdings
CRED top holdings
Sector weights for BANKare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
BANK sectors
CRED sectors
Geographic weights for BANKare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
BANK geography
CRED geography
BANK scores 6.0/10 and CRED scores 6.1/10 on this comparison. The two are effectively level overall.
BANK may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
CRED may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
BANK and CRED do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
BANK and CRED charge the same management fee of 0.25% per year. General information only, not financial advice.
BANK (Global X Australian Bank Credit ETF) manages approximately $185.04M and CRED (Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) manages approximately $1.8B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
BANK and CRED do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. BANK charges 0.25% and CRED charges 0.25%, the same management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
BANK full profile →CRED full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →