Aoris Int Fund (Class B) (Unhedged) Active ETF vs Betashares Global Royalties ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap.
Scored across Cost (43.8%), Fund size (25%), Holdings breadth (31.3%). Past performance is excluded.
See full breakdown ↓Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
BAOR and ROYL are both Thematic ETFs. ROYL has the lower management fee (0.69% vs 1.1% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair.
Aoris Int Fund (Class B) (Unhedged) Active ETF
Other
Betashares Global Royalties ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
BAOR and ROYL suit different goals rather than one being "better" than the other. The clearest differences:
Green highlights the leading comparison score, the factually lower fee, or the higher scale or income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures and the ASX Investment Products report. Fund size, yield, return and holdings figures each state the date they are as at; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Cost (management fee): ROYL has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
Fund size (assets): Both funds are a similar size by assets.
Holdings breadth: ROYL spreads exposure across more holdings (BAOR 16, ROYL 46); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
General information only, not financial advice. ETFLens does not hold an AFSL. Always read the relevant PDS and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser.
Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. ROYL yield as at 30 Apr 2026. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns or distributions. These figures may be out of date. Check the fund manager's website for current performance.
Returns as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. Listed top holdings are as at different dates (BAOR 8 Oct 2026, ROYL 29 Oct 2026), so the two funds' figures are not directly comparable.
BAOR top holdings
ROYL top holdings
Sector weights for BAOR are approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
BAOR sectors
ROYL sectors
Geographic weights for BAOR are approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
BAOR geography
ROYL geography
BAOR and ROYL can each make sense depending on your objectives, horizon and existing portfolio. The key differences are near the top of this page, and the full side-by-side data is below.
BAOR and ROYL do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page.
ROYL has the lower management fee. BAOR charges 1.1% per year ($110 per year on a $10,000 investment) and ROYL charges 0.69% per year ($69 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $41 per year per $10,000 invested.
BAOR (Aoris Int Fund (Class B) (Unhedged) Active ETF) manages approximately $122.12M and ROYL (Betashares Global Royalties ETF) manages approximately $121.03M. Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
BAOR and ROYL do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. BAOR charges 1.1% and ROYL charges 0.69%, so ROYL has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only. This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
BAOR full profile →ROYL full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →