Betashares Cloud Computing ETF vs Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
CLDD and HACK are both thematic global technology ETFs from BetaShares charging the same management fee, but they target different sub-themes.
Betashares Cloud Computing ETF
BetaShares
Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
There is no single "better" fund here - which suits you depends on your goals. The clearest differences between CLDD and HACK:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.67% p.a.
HACK is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
HACK spreads exposure across more holdings (CLDD 38, HACK 42); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
CLDD distributes approximately 0.2% and HACK approximately 3.7%; HACK carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: top 42 holdings.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
CLDD top holdings
HACK top holdings
CLDD sectors
HACK sectors
CLDD geography
HACK geography
CLDD and HACK are both thematic global technology ETFs from BetaShares charging the same management fee, but they target different sub-themes. HACK holds global cybersecurity companies, while CLDD holds cloud computing and software-as-a-service companies. Both are sector-concentrated and carry meaningfully higher single-theme risk than a broad technology or global shares ETF, and their holdings can overlap where large technology names appear in both.
CLDD generally suits investors with conviction in the cloud and software theme, while HACK generally suits investors focused specifically on the cybersecurity theme; both involve concentrated sector risk.
CLDD and HACK have approximately 17% estimated holdings overlap (top 42 holdings). This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists.
CLDD and HACK charge the same management fee of 0.67% per year.
CLDD (Betashares Cloud Computing ETF) manages approximately $36.3M and HACK (Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF) manages approximately $1.4B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 17% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. CLDD charges 0.67% and HACK charges 0.67%, the same management fee, and they have approximately 17% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only. This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
CLDD full profile →HACK full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →