Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF vs Betashares Diversified Balanced ETF
Fund-of-funds structure makes holdings overlap unreliable to estimate.
Scored across Cost (43.8%), Fund size (25%), Holdings breadth (31.3%). Past performance is excluded.
See full breakdown ↓Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
DHHF and DVBA are both Diversified ETFs. Both charge 0.19% p.a. A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair.
Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF
BetaShares
Betashares Diversified Balanced ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
Neither DHHF nor DVBA is the "right" pick for everyone; it comes down to what you want from the holding. Where they differ most:
Green highlights the leading comparison score, the factually lower fee, or the higher scale or income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures and the ASX Investment Products report. Fund size, yield, return and holdings figures each state the date they are as at.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Cost (management fee): Both charge about 0.19% p.a.
Fund size (assets): DHHF is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
Holdings breadth: DHHF and DVBA offer similar breadth of exposure.
General information only, not financial advice. ETFLens does not hold an AFSL. Always read the relevant PDS and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser.
Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. DHHF yield as at 31 Mar 2026. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns or distributions. These figures may be out of date. Check the fund manager's website for current performance.
DHHF returns as at 30 Sep 2026.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. Where a fund does not publish full holdings, its list is not shown here (a category-based estimate appears on the fund page). DHHF listed top holdings as at 30 Apr 2026. These figures may be out of date. Check the fund manager's website for current holdings.
DHHF top holdings
DVBA top holdings
This issuer does not publish full holdings for this fund, so they are not shown here.
Whether DHHF or DVBA fits comes down to your goals, time horizon and what you already hold. The clearest differences are summarised near the top of this page, with the full data below.
DHHF and DVBA do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page.
DHHF and DVBA charge the same management fee of 0.19% per year.
DHHF (Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF) manages approximately $1.7B and DVBA (Betashares Diversified Balanced ETF) manages approximately $3.23M. Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
DHHF and DVBA do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. DHHF charges 0.19% and DVBA charges 0.19%, the same management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only. This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
DHHF full profile →DVBA full profile →DHHF in-depth review →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →