Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF vs Vanguard Diversified Conservative Index ETF
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
DHHF and VDCO are both Diversified ETFs. DHHF tracks the Diversified composite and VDCO tracks the Multiple (Vanguard strategic asset allocation, conservative). DHHF has the lower management fee (0.19% vs 0.27% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 30% estimated (look-through of underlying funds).
Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF
BetaShares
Vanguard Diversified Conservative Index ETF
Vanguard
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
There is no single "better" fund here - which suits you depends on your goals. The clearest differences between DHHF and VDCO:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
DHHF has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
DHHF is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
DHHF and VDCO offer similar breadth of exposure.
DHHF distributes approximately 2.2% and VDCO approximately 3%; VDCO carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: look-through of underlying funds.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
DHHF top holdings
VDCO top holdings
Sector weights for VDCOare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
DHHF sectors
VDCO sectors
Geographic weights for VDCOare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
DHHF geography
VDCO geography
There is no single right choice between DHHF and VDCO - it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. The key differences between the two funds are summarised near the top of this page, with the full side-by-side data below.
DHHF and VDCO have approximately 30% estimated holdings overlap (look-through of underlying funds). This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists.
DHHF has the lower management fee. DHHF charges 0.19% per year ($19 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VDCO charges 0.27% per year ($27 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $8 per year per $10,000 invested.
DHHF (Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF) manages approximately $1.3B and VDCO (Vanguard Diversified Conservative Index ETF) manages approximately $288M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 30% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. DHHF charges 0.19% and VDCO charges 0.27%, so DHHF has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 30% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
DHHF full profile →VDCO full profile →DHHF in-depth review →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →