Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF vs Global X Physical Gold Structured
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap. General information only.
FUEL may suit growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns). GOLD may suit growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF
BetaShares
Global X Physical Gold Structured
Global X
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
FUEL and GOLD are both Thematic ETFs: FUEL tracks the and GOLD tracks the Gold spot price (unhedged AUD). GOLD has the lower management fee (0.4% vs 0.57% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
FUEL charges 0.57% p.a. and GOLD charges 0.4% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
FUEL manages $280.31M and GOLD manages $1.4B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
FUEL holds 45 positions and GOLD holds 1; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
FUEL distributes approximately 1.05% (Quarterly) and GOLD approximately 0% (N/A); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period FUEL returned 15.9% and GOLD returned 17.4%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
FUEL top holdings
GOLD top holdings
Sector weights for FUELare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
FUEL sectors
GOLD sectors
Geographic weights for FUELare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
FUEL geography
GOLD geography
FUEL scores 4.6/10 and GOLD scores 4.8/10 on this comparison. The two are effectively level overall.
FUEL may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
GOLD may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
FUEL and GOLD do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
GOLD has the lower management fee. FUEL charges 0.57% per year ($57 per year on a $10,000 investment) and GOLD charges 0.4% per year ($40 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $17 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
FUEL (Betashares Global Energy Companies Currency Hedged ETF) manages approximately $280.31M and GOLD (Global X Physical Gold Structured) manages approximately $1.4B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
FUEL and GOLD do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. FUEL charges 0.57% and GOLD charges 0.4%, so GOLD has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
FUEL full profile →GOLD full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →