Betashares Video Games and Esports ETF vs Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Video Games and Esports ETF
BetaShares
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
GAME and MNRS are both Thematic ETFs: GAME tracks the and MNRS tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (Hedged into AUD). Both charge 0.57% p.a. Holdings overlap is approximately 0% estimated (top 43 holdings). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.57% p.a. in management fees.
GAME manages $24.34M and MNRS manages $248.9M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
GAME holds 43 positions and MNRS holds 57; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
GAME distributes approximately 1.03% (Quarterly) and MNRS approximately 0.2% (Semi-annually); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period GAME returned 15.1% and MNRS returned 21.6%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: top 43 holdings. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
GAME top holdings
MNRS top holdings
GAME sectors
MNRS sectors
GAME geography
MNRS geography
GAME scores 4.1/10 and MNRS scores 4.1/10 on this comparison. The two are effectively level overall.
GAME may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
MNRS may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
GAME and MNRS have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap (top 43 holdings). This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
GAME and MNRS charge the same management fee of 0.57% per year. General information only, not financial advice.
GAME (Betashares Video Games and Esports ETF) manages approximately $24.34M and MNRS (Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF) manages approximately $248.9M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. GAME charges 0.57% and MNRS charges 0.57%, the same management fee, and they have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
GAME full profile →MNRS full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →