Betashares Wealth Builder Diversified All Growth Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF vs VanEck Core+ Diversified Balanced Active ETF
Fund-of-funds structure makes holdings overlap unreliable to estimate. General information only.
GHHF may suit growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns). VBAL may suit investors seeking broad market exposure.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Wealth Builder Diversified All Growth Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF
BetaShares
VanEck Core+ Diversified Balanced Active ETF
VanEck
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
GHHF and VBAL are both Diversified ETFs: GHHF tracks the Actively managed and VBAL tracks the . GHHF has the lower management fee (0.35% vs 0.39% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
GHHF charges 0.35% p.a. and VBAL charges 0.39% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
GHHF manages $310.6M and VBAL manages $1.3M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
GHHF holds 4,000 positions and VBAL holds 0; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
GHHF distributes approximately 2.1% (Semi-annually) and VBAL approximately 0% (N/A); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
GHHF top holdings
VBAL top holdings
Sector weights for VBALare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
GHHF sectors
VBAL sectors
Geographic weights for VBALare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
GHHF geography
VBAL geography
GHHF scores 7.2/10 and VBAL scores 4.3/10 on this comparison. GHHF has the higher overall comparison score.
GHHF may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
VBAL may suit investors who: investors seeking broad market exposure.
GHHF and VBAL do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
GHHF has the lower management fee. GHHF charges 0.35% per year ($35 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VBAL charges 0.39% per year ($39 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $4 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
GHHF (Betashares Wealth Builder Diversified All Growth Geared (30-40% LVR) Complex ETF) manages approximately $310.6M and VBAL (VanEck Core+ Diversified Balanced Active ETF) manages approximately $1.3M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
GHHF and VBAL do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. GHHF charges 0.35% and VBAL charges 0.39%, so GHHF has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
GHHF full profile →VBAL full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →