iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF vs Global X Gold Bullion ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap. General information only.
GLIN may suit cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees. GXLD may suit growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Global X Gold Bullion ETF
Global X
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
GLIN and GXLD are both Thematic ETFs: GLIN tracks the and GXLD tracks the . Both charge 0.15% p.a. A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.15% p.a. in management fees.
GLIN manages $1.6B and GXLD manages $625.79M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
GLIN holds 157 positions and GXLD holds 0; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
GLIN distributes approximately 2.35% (Quarterly) and GXLD approximately 0% (N/A); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period GLIN returned 10.8% and GXLD returned 24.4%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
GLIN top holdings
GXLD top holdings
Sector weights for GXLDare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
GLIN sectors
GXLD sectors
Geographic weights for GXLDare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
GLIN geography
GXLD geography
GLIN scores 6.6/10 and GXLD scores 5.2/10 on this comparison. GLIN has the higher overall comparison score.
GLIN may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
GXLD may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
GLIN and GXLD do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
GLIN and GXLD charge the same management fee of 0.15% per year. General information only, not financial advice.
GLIN (iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) manages approximately $1.6B and GXLD (Global X Gold Bullion ETF) manages approximately $625.79M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
GLIN and GXLD do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. GLIN charges 0.15% and GXLD charges 0.15%, the same management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
GLIN full profile →GXLD full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →