Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Resources ETF
HACK may suit investors who prefer larger, more established funds. OZR may suit cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF
BetaShares
Comparison Scorei
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Resources ETF
State Street (SPDR)
Comparison Scorei
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only — not financial advice.
HACK scores 5.1/10 and OZR scores 5.2/10 on this comparison (effectively level). HACK may suit investors who prefer larger, more established funds; OZR may suit cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
HACK charges 0.67% p.a. and OZR charges 0.34% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
HACK manages $1.4B and OZR manages $325.74M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
HACK holds 42 positions and OZR holds 54; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
HACK distributes approximately 3.4% (Annually) and OZR approximately 2.88% (Semi-annually); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
| Field | HACK | OZR |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF | State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Resources ETF |
| Provider | BetaShares | State Street (SPDR) |
| Asset class | Thematic | Thematic |
| Index tracked | Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index | S&P/ASX 200 Resources Index |
| Inception | 2016 | 2011 |
| Domicile | Australia | Australia |
| Exchange | ASX | ASX |
| Field | HACK | OZR |
|---|---|---|
| Management fee (MER) | 0.67% p.a. | 0.34% p.a. |
| Est. annual cost on $10,000 | $67 | $34 |
| Est. annual cost on $50,000 | $335 | $170 |
| Est. annual cost on $100,000 | $670 | $340 |
| Field | HACK | OZR |
|---|---|---|
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $325.74M |
| Number of holdings | 42 | 54 |
| Field | HACK | OZR |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution yield | approximately 3.4% | approximately 2.88% |
| Franking | Not available | Not available |
| Payment frequency | Annually | Semi-annually |
| Est. annual income on $50,000 | approximately $1,700 | approximately $1,440 |
| Field | HACK | OZR |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -9.7% | Not available |
| 3-year p.a. | 16.1% | Not available |
| 5-year p.a. | 10.4% | Not available |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
| Field | HACK | OZR |
|---|---|---|
| Holdings overlap | Not reliably estimable | Not reliably estimable |
| Currency hedged | No | No |
| Geographic focus | United States | Australia |
| Top 3 sectors | Information Technology, Industrials, Communication Services | Diversified Metals & Mining, Gold, Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
HACK top holdings
OZR top holdings
HACK scores 5.1/10 and OZR scores 5.2/10 on this comparison. The two are effectively level overall.
HACK may suit investors who: investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
OZR may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
This comparison is general information only and not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Consider your own objectives, financial situation and needs, or speak with a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.
HACK and OZR do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
OZR has the lower management fee. HACK charges 0.67% per year ($67 per year on a $10,000 investment) and OZR charges 0.34% per year ($34 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $33 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
HACK (Betashares Global Cybersecurity ETF) manages approximately $1.4B and OZR (State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Resources ETF) manages approximately $325.74M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
HACK and OZR do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice — it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. HACK charges 0.67% and OZR charges 0.34%, so OZR has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is estimated from listed top holdings, not full constituent lists, and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison. General information only.
Compare other ETFs →