iShares Core Composite Bond ETF vs Betashares U.S. Treasury Bond 7-10 Year Currency Hedged ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
iShares Core Composite Bond ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Betashares U.S. Treasury Bond 7-10 Year Currency Hedged ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
IAF and US10 are both Bonds ETFs: IAF tracks the Bloomberg AusBond Composite 0+ Yr Index and US10 tracks the . IAF has the lower management fee (0.1% vs 0.22% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 0% estimated (top 15 holdings). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
IAF charges 0.1% p.a. and US10 charges 0.22% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
IAF manages $3.6B and US10 manages $21.32M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
IAF holds 732 positions and US10 holds 15; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
IAF distributes approximately 3.4% (Quarterly) and US10 approximately 3.38% (Monthly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period IAF returned 0.2% and US10 returned 2.0%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: top 15 holdings. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
IAF top holdings
US10 top holdings
Sector weights for US10are approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
IAF sectors
US10 sectors
Geographic weights for US10are approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
IAF geography
US10 geography
IAF scores 7.6/10 and US10 scores 4.5/10 on this comparison. IAF has the higher overall comparison score.
IAF may suit investors who: investors seeking broad market exposure.
US10 may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
IAF and US10 have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap (top 15 holdings). This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
IAF has the lower management fee. IAF charges 0.1% per year ($10 per year on a $10,000 investment) and US10 charges 0.22% per year ($22 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $12 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
IAF (iShares Core Composite Bond ETF) manages approximately $3.6B and US10 (Betashares U.S. Treasury Bond 7-10 Year Currency Hedged ETF) manages approximately $21.32M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. IAF charges 0.1% and US10 charges 0.22%, so IAF has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
IAF full profile →US10 full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →