iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF vs Vanguard Ethically Conscious Australian Shares ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Vanguard Ethically Conscious Australian Shares ETF
Vanguard
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
IESG and VETH are both ESG / Ethical ETFs: IESG tracks the and VETH tracks the FTSE Developed ex Australia Choice Index. IESG has the lower management fee (0.09% vs 0.16% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 66% (full holdings data). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
IESG charges 0.09% p.a. and VETH charges 0.16% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
IESG manages $458.16M and VETH manages $624M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
IESG holds 96 positions and VETH holds 229; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
IESG distributes approximately 2.72% (Quarterly) and VETH approximately 2% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period IESG returned 8.5% and VETH returned 7.3%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
IESG top holdings
VETH top holdings
IESG sectors
VETH sectors
IESG geography
VETH geography
IESG scores 6.3/10 and VETH scores 6.3/10 on this comparison. The two are effectively level overall.
IESG may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
VETH may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
IESG and VETH have approximately 66% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered moderate overlap. General information only, not financial advice.
IESG has the lower management fee. IESG charges 0.09% per year ($9 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VETH charges 0.16% per year ($16 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $7 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
IESG (iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF) manages approximately $458.16M and VETH (Vanguard Ethically Conscious Australian Shares ETF) manages approximately $624M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 66% estimated holdings overlap the two funds share a moderate proportion of holdings, so there is some duplicated exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. IESG charges 0.09% and VETH charges 0.16%, so IESG has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 66% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
IESG full profile →VETH full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →