iShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ESG Screened ETF vs Macquarie Income Opportunities Active ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap. General information only.
IHD may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions. MQIO may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
iShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ESG Screened ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Macquarie Income Opportunities Active ETF
Other
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
IHD and MQIO are both Income & Dividends ETFs: IHD tracks the S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities Index and MQIO tracks the . IHD has the lower management fee (0.23% vs 0.49% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
IHD charges 0.23% p.a. and MQIO charges 0.49% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
IHD manages $386.8M and MQIO manages $96.37M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
IHD holds 50 positions and MQIO holds 0; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
IHD distributes approximately 4.19% (Quarterly) and MQIO approximately 4.6% (Monthly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period IHD returned 10.2% and MQIO returned 4.3%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
IHD top holdings
MQIO top holdings
Holdings not published for this fund type.
Sector weights for MQIOare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
IHD sectors
MQIO sectors
Geographic weights for MQIOare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
IHD geography
MQIO geography
IHD scores 6.4/10 and MQIO scores 4.9/10 on this comparison. IHD has the higher overall comparison score.
IHD may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
MQIO may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
IHD and MQIO do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
IHD has the lower management fee. IHD charges 0.23% per year ($23 per year on a $10,000 investment) and MQIO charges 0.49% per year ($49 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $26 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
IHD (iShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ESG Screened ETF) manages approximately $386.8M and MQIO (Macquarie Income Opportunities Active ETF) manages approximately $96.37M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
IHD and MQIO do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. IHD charges 0.23% and MQIO charges 0.49%, so IHD has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
IHD full profile →MQIO full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →