iShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ESG Screened ETF vs Plato Global Shares Income Fund - Active ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap.
Scored across Cost (63.6%), Fund size (36.4%). Past performance is excluded.
See full breakdown ↓Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
IHD and PGI2 are both Income & Dividends ETFs. IHD has the lower management fee (0.23% vs 0.85% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair.
iShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ESG Screened ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Plato Global Shares Income Fund - Active ETF
Other
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
Neither IHD nor PGI2 is the "right" pick for everyone; it comes down to what you want from the holding. Where they differ most:
Green highlights the leading comparison score, the factually lower fee, or the higher scale or income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures and the ASX Investment Products report. Fund size, yield, return and holdings figures each state the date they are as at.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Cost (management fee): IHD has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
Fund size (assets): Both funds are a similar size by assets.
General information only, not financial advice. ETFLens does not hold an AFSL. Always read the relevant PDS and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser.
Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. IHD yield as at 30 Apr 2026. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns or distributions. These figures may be out of date. Check the fund manager's website for current performance.
IHD returns as at 30 Sep 2026.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. Where a fund does not publish full holdings, its list is not shown here (a category-based estimate appears on the fund page). IHD listed top holdings as at 30 Oct 2026.
IHD top holdings
PGI2 top holdings
This issuer does not publish full holdings for this fund, so they are not shown here.
Whether IHD or PGI2 fits comes down to your goals, time horizon and what you already hold. The clearest differences are summarised near the top of this page, with the full data below.
IHD and PGI2 do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page.
IHD has the lower management fee. IHD charges 0.23% per year ($23 per year on a $10,000 investment) and PGI2 charges 0.85% per year ($85 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $62 per year per $10,000 invested.
IHD (iShares S&P/ASX Dividend Opportunities ESG Screened ETF) manages approximately $407.14M and PGI2 (Plato Global Shares Income Fund - Active ETF) manages approximately $429.13M. Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
IHD and PGI2 do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. IHD charges 0.23% and PGI2 charges 0.85%, so IHD has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only. This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
IHD full profile →PGI2 full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →