iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF vs iShares Global 100 ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
iShares Global 100 ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
IHOO and IOO are near-identical Global Broad Market ETFs, with approximately 97% estimated (estimated, limited data) holdings overlap. IOO has the lower management fee (0.4% vs 0.43% p.a.). There is limited reason to hold both, as the second fund adds little new exposure. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
IHOO charges 0.43% p.a. and IOO charges 0.4% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
IHOO manages $720.97M and IOO manages $5.7B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
IHOO holds 117 positions and IOO holds 117; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
IHOO distributes approximately 0.67% (Quarterly) and IOO approximately 1.08% (Semi-annually); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period IHOO returned 22.4% and IOO returned 17.4%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: estimated, limited data. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
IHOO top holdings
IOO top holdings
IHOO sectors
IOO sectors
IHOO geography
IOO geography
IHOO scores 5.3/10 and IOO scores 6.0/10 on this comparison. IOO has the higher overall comparison score.
IHOO may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
IOO may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
IHOO and IOO have approximately 97% estimated holdings overlap (estimated, limited data). This is considered high overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
IOO has the lower management fee. IHOO charges 0.43% per year ($43 per year on a $10,000 investment) and IOO charges 0.4% per year ($40 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $3 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
IHOO (iShares Global 100 AUD Hedged ETF) manages approximately $720.97M and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) manages approximately $5.7B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 97% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold a high proportion of the same companies, so holding both means paying two sets of management fees on largely the same exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. IHOO charges 0.43% and IOO charges 0.4%, so IOO has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 97% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →Check the CGT cost of switching
ProBefore consolidating overlapping ETFs, model the capital gains tax impact with the ETF Switch Calculator.
Calculate CGT cost →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
IHOO full profile →IOO full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →