iShares Global 100 ETF vs VanEck MSCI International Value ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap.
Scored across Cost (35%), Fund size (20%), Holdings breadth (25%), Income (20%). Past performance is excluded.
See full breakdown ↓Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
IOO and VLUE are both Global Broad Market ETFs. Both charge 0.4% p.a. A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair.
iShares Global 100 ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
VanEck MSCI International Value ETF
VanEck
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
Which of IOO and VLUE fits depends on your objectives, not on one being superior. Where the two funds differ most:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.4% p.a.
IOO is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
VLUE spreads exposure across more holdings (IOO 117, VLUE 250); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
IOO distributes approximately 1.08% and VLUE approximately 2.83%; VLUE carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
IOO top holdings
VLUE top holdings
Sector weights for VLUEare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
IOO sectors
VLUE sectors
Geographic weights for VLUEare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
IOO geography
VLUE geography
Choosing between IOO and VLUE depends on your goals, time horizon and current holdings, not on one being the right answer for everyone. The main differences are summarised above, with the complete data below.
IOO and VLUE do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page.
IOO and VLUE charge the same management fee of 0.4% per year.
IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) manages approximately $5.7B and VLUE (VanEck MSCI International Value ETF) manages approximately $453.09M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
IOO and VLUE do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. IOO charges 0.4% and VLUE charges 0.4%, the same management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
IOO full profile →VLUE full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →