Magellan Infra Fund (Currency Hedged) - Active ETF vs Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap.
Scored across Cost, Fund size, Holdings breadth and Income. Past performance is excluded.
See full breakdown ↓Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Magellan Infra Fund (Currency Hedged) - Active ETF
Magellan
Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
MICH and MNRS are both Thematic ETFs: MICH tracks the and MNRS tracks the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index (Hedged into AUD). MNRS has the lower management fee (0.57% vs 1.05% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair.
Key differences at a glance
Which of MICH and MNRS fits depends on your objectives, not on one being superior. Where the two funds differ most:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
MNRS has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
MICH is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
MNRS spreads exposure across more holdings (MICH 0, MNRS 57); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
MICH distributes approximately 3.37% and MNRS approximately 0.2%; MICH carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
MICH top holdings
Holdings not published for this fund type.
MNRS top holdings
Sector weights for MICHare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
MICH sectors
MNRS sectors
Geographic weights for MICHare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
MICH geography
MNRS geography
Choosing between MICH and MNRS depends on your goals, time horizon and current holdings, not on one being the right answer for everyone. The main differences are summarised above, with the complete data below.
MICH and MNRS do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page.
MNRS has the lower management fee. MICH charges 1.05% per year ($105 per year on a $10,000 investment) and MNRS charges 0.57% per year ($57 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $48 per year per $10,000 invested.
MICH (Magellan Infra Fund (Currency Hedged) - Active ETF) manages approximately $522.36M and MNRS (Betashares Global Gold Miners Currency Hedged ETF) manages approximately $248.9M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
MICH and MNRS do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. MICH charges 1.05% and MNRS charges 0.57%, so MNRS has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
MICH full profile →MNRS full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →