Betashares Gold Bullion Currency Hedged ETF vs VanEck Uranium and Energy Innovation ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap.
Scored across Cost (35%), Fund size (20%), Holdings breadth (25%), Income (20%). Past performance is excluded.
See full breakdown ↓Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
QAU and URAN are both Thematic ETFs. Both charge 0.59% p.a. A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair.
Betashares Gold Bullion Currency Hedged ETF
BetaShares
VanEck Uranium and Energy Innovation ETF
VanEck
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
Which of QAU and URAN fits depends on your objectives, not on one being superior. Where the two funds differ most:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.59% p.a.
QAU is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
URAN spreads exposure across more holdings (QAU 1, URAN 25); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
QAU distributes approximately 1.2% and URAN approximately 0%; QAU carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
QAU top holdings
URAN top holdings
Based on each fund's most recently published sector and geographic weightings; figures are approximate. Full breakdowns are shown below.
Sector weights for URANare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
QAU sectors
URAN sectors
QAU geography
URAN geography
Choosing between QAU and URAN depends on your goals, time horizon and current holdings, not on one being the right answer for everyone. The main differences are summarised above, with the complete data below.
QAU and URAN do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page.
QAU and URAN charge the same management fee of 0.59% per year.
QAU (Betashares Gold Bullion Currency Hedged ETF) manages approximately $1.4B and URAN (VanEck Uranium and Energy Innovation ETF) manages approximately $15.02M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
QAU and URAN do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. QAU charges 0.59% and URAN charges 0.59%, the same management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
QAU full profile →URAN full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →