Betashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF vs Betashares U.S. Treasury Bond 7-10 Year Currency Hedged ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF
BetaShares
Betashares U.S. Treasury Bond 7-10 Year Currency Hedged ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
QPON and US10 are both Bonds ETFs: QPON tracks the Solactive Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond Index and US10 tracks the . Both charge 0.22% p.a. Holdings overlap is approximately 0% estimated (top 15 holdings). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.22% p.a. in management fees.
QPON manages $2.0B and US10 manages $21.32M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
QPON holds 14 positions and US10 holds 15; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
QPON distributes approximately 4.4% (Monthly) and US10 approximately 3.38% (Monthly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period QPON returned 3.8% and US10 returned 2.0%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: top 15 holdings. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
QPON top holdings
US10 top holdings
Sector weights for US10are approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
QPON sectors
US10 sectors
Geographic weights for US10are approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
QPON geography
US10 geography
QPON scores 6.2/10 and US10 scores 4.5/10 on this comparison. QPON has the higher overall comparison score.
QPON may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
US10 may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
QPON and US10 have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap (top 15 holdings). This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
QPON and US10 charge the same management fee of 0.22% per year. General information only, not financial advice.
QPON (Betashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF) manages approximately $2.0B and US10 (Betashares U.S. Treasury Bond 7-10 Year Currency Hedged ETF) manages approximately $21.32M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. QPON charges 0.22% and US10 charges 0.22%, the same management fee, and they have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
QPON full profile →US10 full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →