Betashares Global Royalties ETF vs Vanguard Global Technology Index ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap. General information only.
ROYL may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions. VTEK may suit cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Global Royalties ETF
BetaShares
Vanguard Global Technology Index ETF
Vanguard
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
ROYL and VTEK are both Thematic ETFs: ROYL tracks the Solactive Global Royalty Companies Index and VTEK tracks the . VTEK has the lower management fee (0.23% vs 0.69% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
ROYL charges 0.69% p.a. and VTEK charges 0.23% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
ROYL manages $84.3M and VTEK manages $33.13M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
ROYL holds 56 positions and VTEK holds 0; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
ROYL distributes approximately 5.4% (Annually) and VTEK approximately 0% (N/A); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
ROYL top holdings
VTEK top holdings
Sector weights for VTEKare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
ROYL sectors
VTEK sectors
Geographic weights for VTEKare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
ROYL geography
VTEK geography
ROYL scores 5.6/10 and VTEK scores 3.6/10 on this comparison. ROYL has the higher overall comparison score.
ROYL may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
VTEK may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
ROYL and VTEK do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
VTEK has the lower management fee. ROYL charges 0.69% per year ($69 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VTEK charges 0.23% per year ($23 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $46 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
ROYL (Betashares Global Royalties ETF) manages approximately $84.3M and VTEK (Vanguard Global Technology Index ETF) manages approximately $33.13M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
ROYL and VTEK do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. ROYL charges 0.69% and VTEK charges 0.23%, so VTEK has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
ROYL full profile →VTEK full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →