Betashares Australia 200 ETF vs iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
A200 and IOZ both track Australian large-cap shares but follow different indices: A200 tracks the Solactive Australia 200, IOZ tracks the S&P/ASX 200.
Betashares Australia 200 ETF
BetaShares
iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
Neither A200 nor IOZ is the "right" pick for everyone; it comes down to what you want from the holding. Where they differ most:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
A200 has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
Both funds are a similar size by assets.
IOZ spreads exposure across more holdings (A200 201, IOZ 205); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
A200 distributes approximately 3.3% and IOZ approximately 3.4%; IOZ carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
A200 top holdings
IOZ top holdings
A200 sectors
IOZ sectors
A200 geography
IOZ geography
A200 and IOZ both track Australian large-cap shares but follow different indices: A200 tracks the Solactive Australia 200, IOZ tracks the S&P/ASX 200. The two indices overlap substantially in holdings. The primary difference is cost: A200 has a lower management fee, while IOZ is issued by iShares (BlackRock) for investors who prefer that provider.
Investors comparing low-cost Australian equity exposure from two different index providers.
A200 and IOZ have approximately 98% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered high overlap.
A200 has the lower management fee. A200 charges 0.04% per year ($4 per year on a $10,000 investment) and IOZ charges 0.05% per year ($5 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $1 per year per $10,000 invested.
A200 (Betashares Australia 200 ETF) manages approximately $9.5B and IOZ (iShares Core S&P/ASX 200 ETF) manages approximately $9.3B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 98% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold a high proportion of the same companies, so holding both means paying two sets of management fees on largely the same exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. A200 charges 0.04% and IOZ charges 0.05%, so A200 has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 98% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only. This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →Check the CGT cost of switching
ProBefore consolidating overlapping ETFs, model the capital gains tax impact with the ETF Switch Calculator.
Calculate CGT cost →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
A200 full profile →IOZ full profile →A200 in-depth review →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →