Betashares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF vs iShares S&P 500 (AUD Hedged) ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap. General information only.
BBUS may suit investors who prefer larger, more established funds. IHVV may suit investors seeking broad market exposure.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF
BetaShares
iShares S&P 500 (AUD Hedged) ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
BBUS and IHVV are both US Shares ETFs: BBUS tracks the and IHVV tracks the S&P 500 (Hedged AUD). IHVV has the lower management fee (0.1% vs 1.32% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
BBUS charges 1.32% p.a. and IHVV charges 0.1% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
BBUS manages $155.73M and IHVV manages $3.8B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
BBUS holds 0 positions and IHVV holds 503; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
BBUS distributes approximately 0% (N/A) and IHVV approximately 0.76% (Annually); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period BBUS returned -34.3% and IHVV returned 10.9%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
BBUS top holdings
IHVV top holdings
Sector weights for BBUSare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
BBUS sectors
IHVV sectors
Geographic weights for BBUSare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
BBUS geography
IHVV geography
BBUS scores 1.1/10 and IHVV scores 7.6/10 on this comparison. IHVV has the higher overall comparison score.
BBUS may suit investors who: investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
IHVV may suit investors who: investors seeking broad market exposure.
BBUS and IHVV do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
IHVV has the lower management fee. BBUS charges 1.32% per year ($132 per year on a $10,000 investment) and IHVV charges 0.1% per year ($10 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $122 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
BBUS (Betashares US Equities Strong Bear Currency Hedged Complex ETF) manages approximately $155.73M and IHVV (iShares S&P 500 (AUD Hedged) ETF) manages approximately $3.8B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
BBUS and IHVV do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. BBUS charges 1.32% and IHVV charges 0.1%, so IHVV has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
BBUS full profile →IHVV full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →