Betashares Global Shares ETF vs Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
BGBL and VGS both provide exposure to global developed market shares but track different indices.
Betashares Global Shares ETF
BetaShares
Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF
Vanguard
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
Which of BGBL and VGS fits depends on your objectives, not on one being superior. Where the two funds differ most:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
BGBL has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
VGS is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
BGBL and VGS offer similar breadth of exposure.
BGBL distributes approximately 1.2% and VGS approximately 1.6%; VGS carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
BGBL top holdings
VGS top holdings
BGBL sectors
VGS sectors
BGBL geography
VGS geography
BGBL and VGS both provide exposure to global developed market shares but track different indices. VGS tracks the MSCI World ex-Australia Index; BGBL tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index and includes a small allocation to Australian shares. Fee structures differ between the two. Neither ETF hedges currency risk in its standard form.
Investors comparing Vanguard and BetaShares for broad global developed market exposure.
BGBL and VGS have approximately 93% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered high overlap.
BGBL has the lower management fee. BGBL charges 0.08% per year ($8 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VGS charges 0.18% per year ($18 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $10 per year per $10,000 invested.
BGBL (Betashares Global Shares ETF) manages approximately $4.2B and VGS (Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF) manages approximately $17.2B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 93% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold a high proportion of the same companies, so holding both means paying two sets of management fees on largely the same exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. BGBL charges 0.08% and VGS charges 0.18%, so BGBL has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 93% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only. This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →Check the CGT cost of switching
ProBefore consolidating overlapping ETFs, model the capital gains tax impact with the ETF Switch Calculator.
Calculate CGT cost →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
BGBL full profile →VGS full profile →VGS in-depth review →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →