Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF vs Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF - Currency Hedged
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
ETHI and HETH are near-identical ESG / Ethical ETFs, with approximately 100% (full holdings data) holdings overlap. ETHI has the lower management fee (0.59% vs 0.62% p.a.). There is limited reason to hold both, as the second fund adds little new exposure.
Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF
BetaShares
Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF - Currency Hedged
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
Neither ETHI nor HETH is the "right" pick for everyone; it comes down to what you want from the holding. Where they differ most:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
ETHI has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
ETHI is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
ETHI and HETH offer similar breadth of exposure.
ETHI distributes approximately 2.3% and HETH approximately 2.73%; HETH carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
ETHI top holdings
HETH top holdings
ETHI sectors
HETH sectors
Geographic weights for HETHare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
ETHI geography
HETH geography
Whether ETHI or HETH fits comes down to your goals, time horizon and what you already hold. The clearest differences are summarised near the top of this page, with the full data below.
ETHI and HETH have approximately 100% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered high overlap.
ETHI has the lower management fee. ETHI charges 0.59% per year ($59 per year on a $10,000 investment) and HETH charges 0.62% per year ($62 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $3 per year per $10,000 invested.
ETHI (Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF) manages approximately $3.6B and HETH (Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF - Currency Hedged) manages approximately $680.04M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 100% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold a high proportion of the same companies, so holding both means paying two sets of management fees on largely the same exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. ETHI charges 0.59% and HETH charges 0.62%, so ETHI has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 100% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →Check the CGT cost of switching
ProBefore consolidating overlapping ETFs, model the capital gains tax impact with the ETF Switch Calculator.
Calculate CGT cost →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
ETHI full profile →HETH full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →