Betashares Global Green Bond Currency Hedged ETF vs Betashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Global Green Bond Currency Hedged ETF
BetaShares
Betashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
GBND and QPON are both Bonds ETFs: GBND tracks the Solactive Global IG Fixed Rate Green Bond Index - AUD Hedged and QPON tracks the Solactive Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond Index. QPON has the lower management fee (0.22% vs 0.39% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 0% estimated (top 15 holdings). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
GBND charges 0.39% p.a. and QPON charges 0.22% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
GBND manages $206.4M and QPON manages $2.0B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
GBND holds 464 positions and QPON holds 14; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
GBND distributes approximately 2.49% (Quarterly) and QPON approximately 4.4% (Monthly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: top 15 holdings. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
GBND top holdings
QPON top holdings
Sector weights for GBNDare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
GBND sectors
QPON sectors
GBND geography
QPON geography
GBND scores 6.5/10 and QPON scores 6.2/10 on this comparison. The two are effectively level overall.
GBND may suit investors who: investors seeking broad market exposure.
QPON may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
GBND and QPON have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap (top 15 holdings). This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
QPON has the lower management fee. GBND charges 0.39% per year ($39 per year on a $10,000 investment) and QPON charges 0.22% per year ($22 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $17 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
GBND (Betashares Global Green Bond Currency Hedged ETF) manages approximately $206.4M and QPON (Betashares Australian Bank Senior Floating Rate Bond ETF) manages approximately $2.0B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. GBND charges 0.39% and QPON charges 0.22%, so QPON has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
GBND full profile →QPON full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →