Hejaz High Income Active ETF vs Betashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap. General information only.
HJHI may suit growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns). YMAX may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Hejaz High Income Active ETF
Other
Betashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
HJHI and YMAX are both Income & Dividends ETFs: HJHI tracks the and YMAX tracks the Custom covered call strategy. YMAX has the lower management fee (0.76% vs 1.1% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
HJHI charges 1.1% p.a. and YMAX charges 0.76% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
HJHI manages $9.78M and YMAX manages $649.3M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
HJHI holds 0 positions and YMAX holds 20; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
HJHI distributes approximately 1.66% (Monthly) and YMAX approximately 7.6% (Monthly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period HJHI returned 6.6% and YMAX returned 7.2%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
HJHI top holdings
Holdings not published for this fund type.
YMAX top holdings
Sector weights for HJHIare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
HJHI sectors
YMAX sectors
Geographic weights for HJHIare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
HJHI geography
YMAX geography
HJHI scores 2.1/10 and YMAX scores 4.9/10 on this comparison. YMAX has the higher overall comparison score.
HJHI may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
YMAX may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
HJHI and YMAX do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
YMAX has the lower management fee. HJHI charges 1.1% per year ($110 per year on a $10,000 investment) and YMAX charges 0.76% per year ($76 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $34 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
HJHI (Hejaz High Income Active ETF) manages approximately $9.78M and YMAX (Betashares Australian Top 20 Equities Yield Maximiser Complex ETF) manages approximately $649.3M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
HJHI and YMAX do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. HJHI charges 1.1% and YMAX charges 0.76%, so YMAX has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
HJHI full profile →YMAX full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →