BetaShares NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Betashares Nasdaq 100 ETF
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
JNDQ and NDQ are both US Shares ETFs. JNDQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index and NDQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both charge 0.48% p.a. Holdings overlap is approximately 0% (full holdings data).
BetaShares NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
BetaShares
Betashares Nasdaq 100 ETF
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
There is no single "better" fund here - which suits you depends on your goals. The clearest differences between JNDQ and NDQ:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.48% p.a.
NDQ is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
NDQ spreads exposure across more holdings (JNDQ 99, NDQ 103); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
JNDQ distributes approximately 2.33% and NDQ approximately 1%; JNDQ carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
JNDQ top holdings
NDQ top holdings
Sector weights for JNDQare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
JNDQ sectors
NDQ sectors
Geographic weights for JNDQare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
JNDQ geography
NDQ geography
There is no single right choice between JNDQ and NDQ - it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. The key differences between the two funds are summarised near the top of this page, with the full side-by-side data below.
JNDQ and NDQ have approximately 0% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered low overlap.
JNDQ and NDQ charge the same management fee of 0.48% per year.
JNDQ (BetaShares NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) manages approximately $11.98M and NDQ (Betashares Nasdaq 100 ETF) manages approximately $8.7B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. JNDQ charges 0.48% and NDQ charges 0.48%, the same management fee, and they have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
JNDQ full profile →NDQ full profile →NDQ in-depth review →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →