Macquarie Core Australian Equity Active ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
MQAE and STW are highly similar Australian Broad Market ETFs, with approximately 82% (full holdings data) holdings overlap. MQAE has the lower management fee (0.03% vs 0.05% p.a.).
Macquarie Core Australian Equity Active ETF
Other
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF
State Street (SPDR)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
MQAE and STW suit different goals rather than one being "better" than the other. The clearest differences:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
MQAE has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
STW is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
STW spreads exposure across more holdings (MQAE 168, STW 202); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
MQAE distributes approximately 2.28% and STW approximately 3.4%; STW carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
MQAE top holdings
STW top holdings
Sector weights for MQAEare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
MQAE sectors
STW sectors
Geographic weights for MQAEare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
MQAE geography
STW geography
MQAE and STW can each make sense depending on your objectives, horizon and existing portfolio. The key differences are near the top of this page, and the full side-by-side data is below.
MQAE and STW have approximately 82% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered high overlap.
MQAE has the lower management fee. MQAE charges 0.03% per year ($3 per year on a $10,000 investment) and STW charges 0.05% per year ($5 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $2 per year per $10,000 invested.
MQAE (Macquarie Core Australian Equity Active ETF) manages approximately $1.0B and STW (State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ETF) manages approximately $6.4B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 82% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold a high proportion of the same companies, so holding both means paying two sets of management fees on largely the same exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. MQAE charges 0.03% and STW charges 0.05%, so MQAE has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 82% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →Check the CGT cost of switching
ProBefore consolidating overlapping ETFs, model the capital gains tax impact with the ETF Switch Calculator.
Calculate CGT cost →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
MQAE full profile →STW full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →