VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF vs Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
VAS tracks the Australian share market using market-capitalisation weighting, meaning the largest companies (major banks and miners) receive the greatest weight.
VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF
VanEck
Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
Vanguard
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
MVW and VAS suit different goals rather than one being "better" than the other. The clearest differences:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
VAS has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
VAS is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
VAS spreads exposure across more holdings (MVW 75, VAS 316); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
MVW distributes approximately 3.2% and VAS approximately 3.3%; VAS carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
MVW top holdings
VAS top holdings
Based on each fund's most recently published sector and geographic weightings; figures are approximate. Full breakdowns are shown below.
MVW sectors
VAS sectors
MVW geography
VAS geography
VAS tracks the Australian share market using market-capitalisation weighting, meaning the largest companies (major banks and miners) receive the greatest weight. MVW uses an equal-weight methodology across its holdings, reducing concentration in any single company or sector. The two ETFs have different risk and return characteristics as a result of this structural difference.
Investors weighing market-cap-weighted Australian equity exposure against an equal-weight alternative.
MVW and VAS have approximately 46% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered moderate overlap.
VAS has the lower management fee. MVW charges 0.35% per year ($35 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VAS charges 0.07% per year ($7 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $28 per year per $10,000 invested.
MVW (VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF) manages approximately $3.2B and VAS (Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF) manages approximately $26.2B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 46% estimated holdings overlap the two funds share a moderate proportion of holdings, so there is some duplicated exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. MVW charges 0.35% and VAS charges 0.07%, so VAS has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 46% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only. This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
MVW full profile →VAS full profile →VAS in-depth review →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →