Global X Australia 300 ETF vs VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Global X Australia 300 ETF
Global X
VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF
VanEck
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
A300 and MVW are both Australian Broad Market ETFs: A300 tracks the and MVW tracks the MVIS Australia Equal Weight Index. A300 has the lower management fee (0.04% vs 0.35% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 48% (full holdings data). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
A300 charges 0.04% p.a. and MVW charges 0.35% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
A300 manages $10.66M and MVW manages $3.2B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
A300 holds 298 positions and MVW holds 75; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
A300 distributes approximately 1.95% (Quarterly) and MVW approximately 3.2% (Annually); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
A300 top holdings
MVW top holdings
Sector weights for A300are approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
A300 sectors
MVW sectors
Geographic weights for A300are approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
A300 geography
MVW geography
A300 scores 5.9/10 and MVW scores 6.0/10 on this comparison. The two are effectively level overall.
A300 may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
MVW may suit investors who: investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
A300 and MVW have approximately 48% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered moderate overlap. General information only, not financial advice.
A300 has the lower management fee. A300 charges 0.04% per year ($4 per year on a $10,000 investment) and MVW charges 0.35% per year ($35 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $31 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
A300 (Global X Australia 300 ETF) manages approximately $10.66M and MVW (VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF) manages approximately $3.2B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 48% estimated holdings overlap the two funds share a moderate proportion of holdings, so there is some duplicated exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. A300 charges 0.04% and MVW charges 0.35%, so A300 has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 48% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
A300 full profile →MVW full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →