Betashares Australia 200 ETF vs Global X Australia 300 ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Australia 200 ETF
BetaShares
Global X Australia 300 ETF
Global X
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
A200 and A300 are near-identical Australian Broad Market ETFs, with approximately 95% (full holdings data) holdings overlap. Both charge 0.04% p.a. There is limited reason to hold both, as the second fund adds little new exposure. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.04% p.a. in management fees.
A200 manages $9.5B and A300 manages $10.66M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
A200 holds 201 positions and A300 holds 298; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
A200 distributes approximately 3.3% (Quarterly) and A300 approximately 1.95% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
A200 top holdings
A300 top holdings
Sector weights for A300are approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
A200 sectors
A300 sectors
Geographic weights for A300are approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
A200 geography
A300 geography
A200 scores 7.7/10 and A300 scores 5.9/10 on this comparison. A200 has the higher overall comparison score.
A200 may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
A300 may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
A200 and A300 have approximately 95% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered high overlap. General information only, not financial advice.
A200 and A300 charge the same management fee of 0.04% per year. General information only, not financial advice.
A200 (Betashares Australia 200 ETF) manages approximately $9.5B and A300 (Global X Australia 300 ETF) manages approximately $10.66M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 95% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold a high proportion of the same companies, so holding both means paying two sets of management fees on largely the same exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. A200 charges 0.04% and A300 charges 0.04%, the same management fee, and they have approximately 95% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →Check the CGT cost of switching
ProBefore consolidating overlapping ETFs, model the capital gains tax impact with the ETF Switch Calculator.
Calculate CGT cost →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
A200 full profile →A300 full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →