Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF vs iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF
BetaShares
iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
EX20 and ILC are both Australian Broad Market ETFs: EX20 tracks the S&P/ASX 200 excluding the S&P/ASX 20 and ILC tracks the S&P/ASX 20 Index. ILC has the lower management fee (0.24% vs 0.25% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 1% estimated (top 23 holdings). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
EX20 charges 0.25% p.a. and ILC charges 0.24% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
EX20 manages $641.8M and ILC manages $744.17M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
EX20 holds 180 positions and ILC holds 23; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
EX20 distributes approximately 3.9% (Semi-annually) and ILC approximately 4.02% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: top 23 holdings. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
EX20 top holdings
ILC top holdings
EX20 sectors
ILC sectors
EX20 geography
ILC geography
EX20 scores 6.5/10 and ILC scores 6.6/10 on this comparison. The two are effectively level overall.
EX20 may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
ILC may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
EX20 and ILC have approximately 1% estimated holdings overlap (top 23 holdings). This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
ILC has the lower management fee. EX20 charges 0.25% per year ($25 per year on a $10,000 investment) and ILC charges 0.24% per year ($24 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $1 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
EX20 (Betashares Australian Ex-20 Portfolio Diversifier ETF) manages approximately $641.8M and ILC (iShares S&P/ASX 20 ETF) manages approximately $744.17M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 1% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. EX20 charges 0.25% and ILC charges 0.24%, so ILC has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 1% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
EX20 full profile →ILC full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →