Fidelity Global Leaders Active ETF vs Vanguard All-World ex-US Shares Index ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap. General information only.
FCAP may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions. VEU may suit cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Fidelity Global Leaders Active ETF
Other
Vanguard All-World ex-US Shares Index ETF
Vanguard
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
FCAP and VEU are both Global Broad Market ETFs: FCAP tracks the and VEU tracks the FTSE All-World ex US Index. VEU has the lower management fee (0.04% vs 1.1% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
FCAP charges 1.1% p.a. and VEU charges 0.04% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
FCAP manages $7.13M and VEU manages $65.6B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
FCAP holds 0 positions and VEU holds 3,597; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
FCAP distributes approximately 3.97% (Quarterly) and VEU approximately 2.4% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period FCAP returned 5.6% and VEU returned 10.0%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
FCAP top holdings
VEU top holdings
Sector weights for FCAPare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
FCAP sectors
VEU sectors
Geographic weights for FCAPare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
FCAP geography
VEU geography
FCAP scores 2.8/10 and VEU scores 8.6/10 on this comparison. VEU has the higher overall comparison score.
FCAP may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
VEU may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
FCAP and VEU do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
VEU has the lower management fee. FCAP charges 1.1% per year ($110 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VEU charges 0.04% per year ($4 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $106 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
FCAP (Fidelity Global Leaders Active ETF) manages approximately $7.13M and VEU (Vanguard All-World ex-US Shares Index ETF) manages approximately $65.6B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
FCAP and VEU do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. FCAP charges 1.1% and VEU charges 0.04%, so VEU has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
FCAP full profile →VEU full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →