iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF vs iShares Core FTSE Global Property Ex Australia (AUD Hedged) ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
iShares Core FTSE Global Property Ex Australia (AUD Hedged) ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
GLIN and GLPR are both Thematic ETFs: GLIN tracks the and GLPR tracks the . Both charge 0.15% p.a. Holdings overlap is approximately 0% (full holdings data). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Both charge about 0.15% p.a. in management fees.
GLIN manages $1.6B and GLPR manages $639.05M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
GLIN holds 157 positions and GLPR holds 337; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
GLIN distributes approximately 2.35% (Quarterly) and GLPR approximately 3.01% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period GLIN returned 10.8% and GLPR returned 13.9%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
GLIN top holdings
GLPR top holdings
GLIN sectors
GLPR sectors
GLIN geography
GLPR geography
GLIN scores 6.6/10 and GLPR scores 7.7/10 on this comparison. GLPR has the higher overall comparison score.
GLIN may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
GLPR may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
GLIN and GLPR have approximately 0% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered low overlap. General information only, not financial advice.
GLIN and GLPR charge the same management fee of 0.15% per year. General information only, not financial advice.
GLIN (iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) manages approximately $1.6B and GLPR (iShares Core FTSE Global Property Ex Australia (AUD Hedged) ETF) manages approximately $639.05M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. GLIN charges 0.15% and GLPR charges 0.15%, the same management fee, and they have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
GLIN full profile →GLPR full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →