Barrow Hanley Global Share Active ETF vs Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap.
Scored across Cost (35%), Fund size (20%), Holdings breadth (25%), Income (20%). Past performance is excluded.
See full breakdown ↓Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
GLOB and VGS are both Global Broad Market ETFs. VGS has the lower management fee (0.18% vs 0.99% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair.
Barrow Hanley Global Share Active ETF
Other
Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF
Vanguard
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
GLOB and VGS suit different goals rather than one being "better" than the other. The clearest differences:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
VGS has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
VGS is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
VGS spreads exposure across more holdings (GLOB 60, VGS 1,252); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
GLOB distributes approximately 0% and VGS approximately 1.6%; VGS carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. Where a fund does not publish full holdings, its list is not shown here (a category-based estimate appears on the fund page).
GLOB top holdings
This issuer does not publish full holdings for this fund, so they are not shown here.
VGS top holdings
Sector weights for GLOBare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
GLOB sectors
VGS sectors
Geographic weights for GLOBare approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
GLOB geography
VGS geography
GLOB and VGS can each make sense depending on your objectives, horizon and existing portfolio. The key differences are near the top of this page, and the full side-by-side data is below.
GLOB and VGS do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page.
VGS has the lower management fee. GLOB charges 0.99% per year ($99 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VGS charges 0.18% per year ($18 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $81 per year per $10,000 invested.
GLOB (Barrow Hanley Global Share Active ETF) manages approximately $503.37M and VGS (Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF) manages approximately $15.5B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
GLOB and VGS do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. GLOB charges 0.99% and VGS charges 0.18%, so VGS has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
GLOB full profile →VGS full profile →VGS in-depth review →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →