Global X Ultra Long Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
LNAS may suit growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns). SPY may suit investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Global X Ultra Long Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF
Global X
Comparison Scorei
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
State Street (SPDR)
Comparison Scorei
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only — not financial advice.
LNAS scores 3.3/10 and SPY scores 7.6/10 on this comparison, with SPY leading on Cost. LNAS may suit growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns); SPY may suit investors who prefer larger, more established funds. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
LNAS charges 1% p.a. and SPY charges 0.09% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
LNAS manages $2.9M and SPY manages $1089.4B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
LNAS holds 3 positions and SPY holds 504; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
LNAS distributes approximately 3.7% (Annually) and SPY approximately 1% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
| Field | LNAS | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Global X Ultra Long Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF | State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust |
| Provider | Global X | State Street (SPDR) |
| Asset class | US Shares | US Shares |
| Index tracked | Nasdaq-100 Index (200-275% geared via futures) | S&P 500 |
| Inception | 2020 | 2014 |
| Domicile | Australia | United States |
| Exchange | ASX | ASX |
| Field | LNAS | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Management fee (MER) | 1% p.a. | 0.09% p.a. |
| Est. annual cost on $10,000 | $100 | $9 |
| Est. annual cost on $50,000 | $500 | $45 |
| Est. annual cost on $100,000 | $1,000 | $90 |
| Field | LNAS | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9M | $1089.4B |
| Number of holdings | 3 | 504 |
| Field | LNAS | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution yield | approximately 3.7% | approximately 1% |
| Franking | Not available | Not available |
| Payment frequency | Annually | Quarterly |
| Est. annual income on $50,000 | approximately $1,850 | approximately $500 |
| Field | LNAS | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | 29.6% | Not available |
| 3-year p.a. | Not available | Not available |
| 5-year p.a. | Not available | Not available |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
| Field | LNAS | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Holdings overlap | Not reliably estimable | Not reliably estimable |
| Currency hedged | No | No |
| Geographic focus | United States | United States |
| Top 3 sectors | Information Technology | Information Technology, Financials, Communication Services |
LNAS top holdings
SPY top holdings
LNAS scores 3.3/10 and SPY scores 7.6/10 on this comparison. SPY has the higher overall comparison score.
LNAS may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
SPY may suit investors who: investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
This comparison is general information only and not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Consider your own objectives, financial situation and needs, or speak with a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.
LNAS and SPY do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
SPY has the lower management fee. LNAS charges 1% per year ($100 per year on a $10,000 investment) and SPY charges 0.09% per year ($9 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $91 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
LNAS (Global X Ultra Long Nasdaq 100 Complex ETF) manages approximately $2.9M and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) manages approximately $1089.4B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
LNAS and SPY do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice — it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. LNAS charges 1% and SPY charges 0.09%, so SPY has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is estimated from listed top holdings, not full constituent lists, and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison. General information only.
Compare other ETFs →