FANG vs NDQ ETF Comparison
Global X FANG+ ETF vs Betashares Nasdaq 100 ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Last updated: May 2026
Verdict
NDQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, providing exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange. FANG tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index, which holds a concentrated portfolio of approximately 10 leading technology and technology-adjacent companies. FANG carries significantly higher concentration risk than NDQ. Both are growth-oriented and have substantial US technology exposure. This is general information only and not financial advice.
Investors comparing broad Nasdaq-100 exposure against a highly concentrated mega-cap tech ETF.
FANG and NDQ have approximately 78% estimated holdings overlap (from the top 10 listed holdings of each fund), meaning the two funds share a high proportion of the same underlying companies by weight. Investors holding both funds pay management fees on each position separately.
| ETF | Full name | Annual fee | Cost per $10,000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| FANG | Global X FANG+ ETF | 0.35% p.a. | $35/yr |
| NDQ | Betashares Nasdaq 100 ETF | 0.48% p.a. | $48/yr |
General information only, not financial advice. Fee data sourced from fund manager PDS documents, updated quarterly. Always verify current fees directly with the fund provider before making investment decisions.
General information only, not financial advice
ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) and does not provide financial product advice. The information and tools on this page are general information only and do not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before investing, read the relevant Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) available from the fund manager. Consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser before making any investment decision.
Compare any two ASX ETFs
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers above to see fees, holdings overlap and a plain-English summary of the key differences.
Popular comparisons
General information only · Not financial advice · Data updated quarterly · Always read the relevant PDS and consider consulting a licensed financial adviser.
FANG vs NDQ: frequently asked questions
What is the holdings overlap between FANG and NDQ?
FANG and NDQ have approximately 78% estimated holdings overlap, based on the top 10 listed holdings of each fund. This is considered high overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
Which has the lower fee, FANG or NDQ?
FANG has the lower management fee. FANG charges 0.35% per year ($35 per year on a $10,000 investment) and NDQ charges 0.48% per year ($48 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $13 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
How large are FANG and NDQ?
FANG (Global X FANG+ ETF) manages approximately $1.7B and NDQ (Betashares Nasdaq 100 ETF) manages approximately $8.7B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
Can I hold both FANG and NDQ?
You can hold both, but with approximately 78% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold a high proportion of the same companies, so holding both means paying two sets of management fees on largely the same exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
Should I choose FANG or NDQ?
There is no universally right choice — it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. FANG charges 0.35% and NDQ charges 0.48%, so FANG has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 78% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is estimated from listed top holdings, not full constituent lists, and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.