State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex A-REIT ETF vs Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex A-REIT ETF
State Street (SPDR)
Comparison Scorei
Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF
Vanguard
Comparison Scorei
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only — not financial advice.
OZF scores 5/10 and VAS scores 8.1/10 on this comparison, with VAS leading on Scale & Liquidity. OZF may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions; VAS may suit investors who prefer larger, more established funds. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
OZF charges 0.34% p.a. and VAS charges 0.07% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
OZF manages $44.86M and VAS manages $24.3B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
OZF holds 31 positions and VAS holds 316; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
OZF distributes approximately 3.61% (Semi-annually) and VAS approximately 3.3% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
| Field | OZF | VAS |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex A-REIT ETF | Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF |
| Provider | State Street (SPDR) | Vanguard |
| Asset class | Thematic | Australian Broad Market |
| Index tracked | S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex A-REIT Index | S&P/ASX 300 |
| Inception | 2011 | 2009 |
| Domicile | Australia | Australia |
| Exchange | ASX | ASX |
| Field | OZF | VAS |
|---|---|---|
| Management fee (MER) | 0.34% p.a. | 0.07% p.a. |
| Est. annual cost on $10,000 | $34 | $7 |
| Est. annual cost on $50,000 | $170 | $35 |
| Est. annual cost on $100,000 | $340 | $70 |
| Field | OZF | VAS |
|---|---|---|
| Fund size (AUM) | $44.86M | $24.3B |
| Number of holdings | 31 | 316 |
| Field | OZF | VAS |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution yield | approximately 3.61% | approximately 3.3% |
| Franking | Not available | Not available |
| Payment frequency | Semi-annually | Quarterly |
| Est. annual income on $50,000 | approximately $1,805 | approximately $1,650 |
| Field | OZF | VAS |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | Not available | 10.1% |
| 3-year p.a. | Not available | 9.4% |
| 5-year p.a. | Not available | 8.4% |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
| Field | OZF | VAS |
|---|---|---|
| Holdings overlap | approximately 57% | approximately 57% |
| Currency hedged | No | No |
| Geographic focus | Australia | Australia |
| Top 3 sectors | Diversified Banks, Diversified Capital Markets, Property & Casualty Insurance | Financials, Materials, Industrials |
OZF top holdings
VAS top holdings
OZF scores 5/10 and VAS scores 8.1/10 on this comparison. VAS has the higher overall comparison score.
OZF may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
VAS may suit investors who: investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
This comparison is general information only and not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Consider your own objectives, financial situation and needs, or speak with a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.
OZF and VAS have approximately 57% estimated holdings overlap, based on the top 10 listed holdings of each fund. This is considered moderate overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
VAS has the lower management fee. OZF charges 0.34% per year ($34 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VAS charges 0.07% per year ($7 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $27 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
OZF (State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex A-REIT ETF) manages approximately $44.86M and VAS (Vanguard Australian Shares Index ETF) manages approximately $24.3B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 57% estimated holdings overlap the two funds share a moderate proportion of holdings, so there is some duplicated exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice — it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. OZF charges 0.34% and VAS charges 0.07%, so VAS has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 57% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is estimated from listed top holdings, not full constituent lists, and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison. General information only.
Compare other ETFs →