Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF vs SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap.
Scored across Cost (35%), Fund size (20%), Holdings breadth (25%), Income (20%). Past performance is excluded.
See full breakdown ↓Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
RCAP and SLF are both Property ETFs. SLF has the lower management fee (0.16% vs 0.8% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair.
Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF
Other
SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF
State Street (SPDR)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
Which of RCAP and SLF fits depends on your objectives, not on one being superior. Where the two funds differ most:
Green highlights the leading comparison score, the factually lower fee, or the higher scale or income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures and the ASX Investment Products report. Fund size, yield, return and holdings figures each state the date they are as at; sector and geography figures for some funds are category-inferred estimates, clearly labelled on each fund's page.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
Cost (management fee): SLF has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
Fund size (assets): RCAP is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
Holdings breadth: RCAP spreads exposure across more holdings (RCAP 45, SLF 18); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
Income (distribution yield): RCAP distributes approximately 1.97% and SLF distributes approximately 4.6%; SLF carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
General information only, not financial advice. ETFLens does not hold an AFSL. Always read the relevant PDS and consider seeking advice from a licensed financial adviser.
Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Yields as at 30 Apr 2026 for both funds. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns or distributions. These figures may be out of date. Check the fund manager's website for current performance.
Returns as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. Listed top holdings are as at different dates (RCAP 30 Jun 2026, SLF 30 Oct 2026), so the two funds' figures are not directly comparable. These figures may be out of date. Check the fund manager's website for current holdings.
RCAP top holdings
SLF top holdings
Sector weights for RCAP and SLF are approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
RCAP sectors
SLF sectors
Geographic weights for RCAP are approximate, inferred from the fund's category.
RCAP geography
SLF geography
Choosing between RCAP and SLF depends on your goals, time horizon and current holdings, not on one being the right answer for everyone. The main differences are summarised above, with the complete data below.
RCAP and SLF do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page.
SLF has the lower management fee. RCAP charges 0.8% per year ($80 per year on a $10,000 investment) and SLF charges 0.16% per year ($16 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $64 per year per $10,000 invested.
RCAP (Resolution Capital Global Property Securities Fund - Active ETF) manages approximately $2.1B and SLF (SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF) manages approximately $463.73M. Fund sizes as at 30 Sep 2026 for both funds. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
RCAP and SLF do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. RCAP charges 0.8% and SLF charges 0.16%, so SLF has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only. This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
RCAP full profile →SLF full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →