Betashares Ethical Australian Bond ETF vs Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF - Currency Hedged
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Ethical Australian Bond ETF
BetaShares
Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF - Currency Hedged
BetaShares
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
AEBD and HETH are both ESG / Ethical ETFs: AEBD tracks the and HETH tracks the . AEBD has the lower management fee (0.34% vs 0.62% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 0% (full holdings data). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
AEBD charges 0.34% p.a. and HETH charges 0.62% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
AEBD manages $69.34M and HETH manages $680.04M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
AEBD holds 282 positions and HETH holds 211; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
AEBD distributes approximately 3.98% (Monthly) and HETH approximately 2.73% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period AEBD returned -0.9% and HETH returned 14.1%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
AEBD top holdings
HETH top holdings
Sector weights for AEBDare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
AEBD sectors
HETH sectors
Geographic weights for AEBD and HETHare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
AEBD geography
HETH geography
AEBD scores 5.7/10 and HETH scores 5.9/10 on this comparison. The two are effectively level overall.
AEBD may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
HETH may suit investors who: growth-oriented investors (noting past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns).
AEBD and HETH have approximately 0% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered low overlap. General information only, not financial advice.
AEBD has the lower management fee. AEBD charges 0.34% per year ($34 per year on a $10,000 investment) and HETH charges 0.62% per year ($62 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $28 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
AEBD (Betashares Ethical Australian Bond ETF) manages approximately $69.34M and HETH (Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF - Currency Hedged) manages approximately $680.04M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. AEBD charges 0.34% and HETH charges 0.62%, so AEBD has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 0% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
AEBD full profile →HETH full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →