Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Global X US Treasury Bond ETF (Currency Hedged)
These ETFs invest in different asset classes (shares vs bonds). They are unlikely to share holdings. General information only.
CRED may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions. USTB may suit cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. These funds invest in different markets, so the expected overlap is approximately 0%.
Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
BetaShares
Global X US Treasury Bond ETF (Currency Hedged)
Global X
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
CRED and USTB are both Bonds ETFs: CRED tracks the Solactive Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond Select TR Index and USTB tracks the . USTB has the lower management fee (0.19% vs 0.25% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
CRED charges 0.25% p.a. and USTB charges 0.19% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
CRED manages $1.8B and USTB manages $594.01M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
CRED holds 62 positions and USTB holds 299; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
CRED distributes approximately 5.2% (Monthly) and USTB approximately 3.36% (Monthly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period CRED returned 1.0% and USTB returned 1.3%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
CRED top holdings
USTB top holdings
Sector weights for USTBare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
CRED sectors
USTB sectors
Geographic weights for USTBare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
CRED geography
USTB geography
CRED scores 6.1/10 and USTB scores 6.4/10 on this comparison. USTB has the higher overall comparison score.
CRED may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
USTB may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
CRED and USTB do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
USTB has the lower management fee. CRED charges 0.25% per year ($25 per year on a $10,000 investment) and USTB charges 0.19% per year ($19 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $6 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
CRED (Betashares Australian Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) manages approximately $1.8B and USTB (Global X US Treasury Bond ETF (Currency Hedged)) manages approximately $594.01M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
CRED and USTB do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. CRED charges 0.25% and USTB charges 0.19%, so USTB has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
CRED full profile →USTB full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →