iShares S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
iShares S&P 500 ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Comparison Scorei
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
State Street (SPDR)
Comparison Scorei
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only — not financial advice.
IVV and SPY both track the S&P 500 Index of 500 large US companies, so their underlying holdings are nearly identical. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
IVV charges 0.04% p.a. and SPY charges 0.09% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
IVV manages $13.4B and SPY manages $1089.4B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
IVV holds 503 positions and SPY holds 504; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
IVV distributes approximately 1.1% (Quarterly) and SPY approximately 1% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
| Field | IVV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | iShares S&P 500 ETF | State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust |
| Provider | BlackRock (iShares) | State Street (SPDR) |
| Asset class | US Shares | US Shares |
| Index tracked | S&P 500 | S&P 500 |
| Inception | 2007 | 2014 |
| Domicile | Australia | United States |
| Exchange | ASX | ASX |
| Field | IVV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Management fee (MER) | 0.04% p.a. | 0.09% p.a. |
| Est. annual cost on $10,000 | $4 | $9 |
| Est. annual cost on $50,000 | $20 | $45 |
| Est. annual cost on $100,000 | $40 | $90 |
| Field | IVV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Fund size (AUM) | $13.4B | $1089.4B |
| Number of holdings | 503 | 504 |
| Field | IVV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution yield | approximately 1.1% | approximately 1% |
| Franking | Not available | Not available |
| Payment frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Est. annual income on $50,000 | approximately $550 | approximately $500 |
| Field | IVV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | 16.4% | Not available |
| 3-year p.a. | 17.2% | Not available |
| 5-year p.a. | 14.2% | Not available |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
| Field | IVV | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Holdings overlap | approximately 94% | approximately 94% |
| Currency hedged | No | No |
| Geographic focus | United States | United States |
| Top 3 sectors | Information Technology, Financials, Communication Services | Information Technology, Financials, Communication Services |
IVV top holdings
SPY top holdings
IVV and SPY both track the S&P 500 Index of 500 large US companies, so their underlying holdings are nearly identical. The main practical difference is cost: IVV (iShares) carries a lower management fee than SPY (SPDR) on the ASX. The US-listed SPY is the world's largest ETF by assets, a brand association some investors value. This is general information only and not financial advice.
IVV generally suits cost-focused investors wanting S&P 500 exposure at the lower fee, while SPY generally suits investors who specifically prefer the SPDR S&P 500 product and its brand and liquidity association.
This comparison is general information only and not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Consider your own objectives, financial situation and needs, or speak with a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.
IVV and SPY have approximately 94% estimated holdings overlap, based on the top 10 listed holdings of each fund. This is considered high overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
IVV has the lower management fee. IVV charges 0.04% per year ($4 per year on a $10,000 investment) and SPY charges 0.09% per year ($9 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $5 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
IVV (iShares S&P 500 ETF) manages approximately $13.4B and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust) manages approximately $1089.4B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 94% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold a high proportion of the same companies, so holding both means paying two sets of management fees on largely the same exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice — it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. IVV charges 0.04% and SPY charges 0.09%, so IVV has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 94% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is estimated from listed top holdings, not full constituent lists, and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison. General information only.
Compare other ETFs →