Martin Currie Real Income Fund - Active ETF vs Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF
These ETFs do not share enough listed holdings to estimate overlap. General information only.
R3AL may suit investors seeking income and dividend distributions. VHY may suit investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
Scored across Cost, Scale, Diversification, Income and Performance. General information only, not financial advice.
See full breakdown ↓General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Martin Currie Real Income Fund - Active ETF
Other
Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF
Vanguard
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
R3AL and VHY are both Income & Dividends ETFs: R3AL tracks the and VHY tracks the FTSE Australia High Dividend Yield Index. VHY has the lower management fee (0.25% vs 0.85% p.a.). A holdings overlap is not reliably estimable for this pair. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
R3AL charges 0.85% p.a. and VHY charges 0.25% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
R3AL manages $470.27M and VHY manages $7.2B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
R3AL holds 0 positions and VHY holds 73; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
R3AL distributes approximately 6.11% (Monthly) and VHY approximately 4.1% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period R3AL returned 4.2% and VHY returned 11.9%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
R3AL top holdings
Holdings not published for this fund type.
VHY top holdings
Sector weights for R3ALare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
R3AL sectors
VHY sectors
Geographic weights for R3ALare approximate, inferred from the fund's category. General information only.
R3AL geography
VHY geography
R3AL scores 4.3/10 and VHY scores 7.2/10 on this comparison. VHY has the higher overall comparison score.
R3AL may suit investors who: investors seeking income and dividend distributions.
VHY may suit investors who: investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
R3AL and VHY do not share enough listed top holdings to reliably estimate a holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors on this page. General information only, not financial advice.
VHY has the lower management fee. R3AL charges 0.85% per year ($85 per year on a $10,000 investment) and VHY charges 0.25% per year ($25 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $60 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
R3AL (Martin Currie Real Income Fund - Active ETF) manages approximately $470.27M and VHY (Vanguard Australian Shares High Yield ETF) manages approximately $7.2B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
R3AL and VHY do not share enough listed top holdings to estimate overlap, so whether holding both duplicates your exposure depends on their full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. R3AL charges 0.85% and VHY charges 0.25%, so VHY has the lower management fee. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
R3AL full profile →VHY full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →