SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
E200 and IESG are both ESG / Ethical ETFs. E200 has the lower management fee (0.05% vs 0.09% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 58% (full holdings data).
SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF
State Street (SPDR)
iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations.
Key differences at a glance
Neither E200 nor IESG is the "right" pick for everyone; it comes down to what you want from the holding. Where they differ most:
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
E200 has the lower management fee - the one objective "cheaper" axis.
IESG is the larger fund. Larger is not inherently better, but greater scale can support tighter spreads and lower closure risk.
E200 spreads exposure across more holdings (E200 103, IESG 96); the other is more concentrated. Neither is inherently better - it depends on whether you want breadth or a focused tilt.
E200 distributes approximately 5.75% and IESG approximately 2.72%; E200 carries the higher estimated distribution yield. A higher yield may suit an income focus; a lower one may suit a growth or tax-efficiency focus. Yields are estimates and are not guaranteed; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures.
E200 top holdings
IESG top holdings
Based on each fund's most recently published sector and geographic weightings; figures are approximate. Full breakdowns are shown below.
E200 sectors
IESG sectors
E200 geography
IESG geography
Whether E200 or IESG fits comes down to your goals, time horizon and what you already hold. The clearest differences are summarised near the top of this page, with the full data below.
E200 and IESG have approximately 58% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered moderate overlap.
E200 has the lower management fee. E200 charges 0.05% per year ($5 per year on a $10,000 investment) and IESG charges 0.09% per year ($9 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $4 per year per $10,000 invested.
E200 (SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF) manages approximately $391.6M and IESG (iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF) manages approximately $458.16M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee.
You can hold both, but with approximately 58% estimated holdings overlap the two funds share a moderate proportion of holdings, so there is some duplicated exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. E200 charges 0.05% and IESG charges 0.09%, so E200 has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 58% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
E200 full profile →IESG full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →