SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is calculated from each fund's full published holdings list. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF
State Street (SPDR)
iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF
BlackRock (iShares)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
E200 and IESG are both ESG / Ethical ETFs: E200 tracks the S&P/ASX 200 Index and IESG tracks the . E200 has the lower management fee (0.05% vs 0.09% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 57% (full holdings data). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
E200 charges 0.05% p.a. and IESG charges 0.09% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
E200 manages $391.6M and IESG manages $458.16M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
E200 holds 103 positions and IESG holds 96; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
E200 distributes approximately 5.75% (Quarterly) and IESG approximately 2.72% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period E200 returned 10.9% and IESG returned 8.5%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: full holdings data. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
E200 top holdings
IESG top holdings
E200 sectors
IESG sectors
E200 geography
IESG geography
E200 scores 7.4/10 and IESG scores 6.3/10 on this comparison. E200 has the higher overall comparison score.
E200 may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
IESG may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
E200 and IESG have approximately 57% holdings overlap, based on each fund's full published holdings list. This is considered moderate overlap. General information only, not financial advice.
E200 has the lower management fee. E200 charges 0.05% per year ($5 per year on a $10,000 investment) and IESG charges 0.09% per year ($9 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $4 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
E200 (SPDR S&P/ASX 200 ESG ETF) manages approximately $391.6M and IESG (iShares Core MSCI Australia ESG ETF) manages approximately $458.16M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 57% estimated holdings overlap the two funds share a moderate proportion of holdings, so there is some duplicated exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. E200 charges 0.05% and IESG charges 0.09%, so E200 has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 57% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
E200 full profile →IESG full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →