VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF vs SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF
VanEck
SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF
State Street (SPDR)
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only, not financial advice.
MVW and SFY are both Australian Broad Market ETFs: MVW tracks the MVIS Australia Equal Weight Index and SFY tracks the S&P/ASX 50 Index. SFY has the lower management fee (0.2% vs 0.35% p.a.). Holdings overlap is approximately 43% estimated (top 50 holdings). General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
MVW charges 0.35% p.a. and SFY charges 0.2% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
MVW manages $3.2B and SFY manages $709.43M; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
MVW holds 75 positions and SFY holds 50; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
MVW distributes approximately 3.2% (Annually) and SFY approximately 3.68% (Quarterly); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Over the compared period MVW returned 8.1% and SFY returned 10.9%. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
Yield figures are estimates based on recent distributions and may vary. Past distributions are not a reliable indicator of future distributions. General information only.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Top shared holdings ranked by overlap contribution, the smaller of each company's weight in the two funds. Basis: top 50 holdings. General information only.
Top 10 listed holdings for each fund, from issuer disclosures. General information only.
MVW top holdings
SFY top holdings
MVW sectors
SFY sectors
MVW geography
SFY geography
MVW scores 6.0/10 and SFY scores 6.5/10 on this comparison. SFY has the higher overall comparison score.
MVW may suit investors who: investors who prefer larger, more established funds.
SFY may suit investors who: cost-conscious investors who prioritise lower ongoing fees.
MVW and SFY have approximately 43% estimated holdings overlap (top 50 holdings). This is considered moderate overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
SFY has the lower management fee. MVW charges 0.35% per year ($35 per year on a $10,000 investment) and SFY charges 0.2% per year ($20 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $15 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
MVW (VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF) manages approximately $3.2B and SFY (SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF) manages approximately $709.43M. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 43% estimated holdings overlap the two funds share a moderate proportion of holdings, so there is some duplicated exposure. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice. It depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. MVW charges 0.35% and SFY charges 0.2%, so SFY has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 43% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is calculated from each fund's published holdings (full lists where the issuer publishes one, listed top holdings otherwise), and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Check your portfolio overlap
See how these ETFs interact with your other holdings.
Open overlap checker →Build your portfolio
ProModel a portfolio with these ETFs and see projected fees and income.
Build a portfolio →View full ETF profiles
Holdings, fees, sectors and distributions for each fund.
MVW full profile →SFY full profile →Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison.
Compare other ETFs →