Betashares Climate Change Innovation ETF vs Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF
General information only, not financial advice.
Overlap is estimated from the funds' listed top holdings, not their full constituent lists. Where there are no shared listed holdings it is shown as not reliably estimable.
Betashares Climate Change Innovation ETF
BetaShares
Comparison Scorei
Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF
BetaShares
Comparison Scorei
Comparison scores reflect how each ETF compares to the other on these specific dimensions only. They are not absolute ratings or recommendations. General information only — not financial advice.
ETHI and ERTH are both ethically screened global equity ETFs from BetaShares, but they differ in breadth. General information only, not financial advice.
Category scores compare these two ETFs only and are not absolute ratings.
ERTH charges 0.65% p.a. and ETHI charges 0.59% p.a.; the lower fee leads on cost.
ERTH manages $90.2M and ETHI manages $3.6B; the larger fund leads on scale, which can support tighter spreads.
ERTH holds 100 positions and ETHI holds 200; the fund with broader holdings leads on diversification.
ERTH distributes approximately 0.4% (Semi-annually) and ETHI approximately 2.3% (Semi-annually); the higher distribution yield leads on income.
Historical return data is not available for both funds, so this dimension is shown as neutral. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Green highlights the factually lower fee or higher scale/income figure. Performance is never highlighted. Data from issuer disclosures, reviewed quarterly.
| Field | ERTH | ETHI |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Betashares Climate Change Innovation ETF | Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF |
| Provider | BetaShares | BetaShares |
| Asset class | Thematic | ESG / Ethical |
| Index tracked | Solactive Climate Change and Environmental Opportunities Index | Solactive Sustainability Leaders Index |
| Inception | 2021 | 2017 |
| Domicile | Australia | Australia |
| Exchange | ASX | ASX |
| Field | ERTH | ETHI |
|---|---|---|
| Management fee (MER) | 0.65% p.a. | 0.59% p.a. |
| Est. annual cost on $10,000 | $65 | $59 |
| Est. annual cost on $50,000 | $325 | $295 |
| Est. annual cost on $100,000 | $650 | $590 |
| Field | ERTH | ETHI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund size (AUM) | $90.2M | $3.6B |
| Number of holdings | 100 | 200 |
| Field | ERTH | ETHI |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution yield | approximately 0.4% | approximately 2.3% |
| Franking | Not available | Not available |
| Payment frequency | Semi-annually | Semi-annually |
| Est. annual income on $50,000 | approximately $200 | approximately $1,150 |
| Field | ERTH | ETHI |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | Not available | 3.8% |
| 3-year p.a. | Not available | 10.9% |
| 5-year p.a. | Not available | 9.4% |
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
| Field | ERTH | ETHI |
|---|---|---|
| Holdings overlap | approximately 9% | approximately 9% |
| Currency hedged | No | No |
| Geographic focus | United States | United States |
| Top 3 sectors | Enabling Solutions, Green Transportation, Green Energy | Information Technology, Financials, Health Care |
ERTH top holdings
ETHI top holdings
ETHI and ERTH are both ethically screened global equity ETFs from BetaShares, but they differ in breadth. ETHI (Global Sustainability Leaders) holds a broad portfolio of large global companies passing climate and ethical exclusion screens. ERTH (Climate Change Innovation) is a narrower thematic fund concentrated in clean-energy and climate-solution companies, carrying a higher management fee and greater concentration risk than ETHI. This is general information only and not financial advice.
ETHI generally suits investors wanting a broad ethically screened global holding, while ERTH generally suits investors seeking concentrated exposure to the climate and clean-energy theme and comfortable with its higher concentration.
This comparison is general information only and not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Consider your own objectives, financial situation and needs, or speak with a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.
ERTH and ETHI have approximately 9% estimated holdings overlap, based on the top 10 listed holdings of each fund. This is considered low overlap, estimated from listed top holdings rather than the full constituent lists. General information only, not financial advice.
ETHI has the lower management fee. ERTH charges 0.65% per year ($65 per year on a $10,000 investment) and ETHI charges 0.59% per year ($59 per year on a $10,000 investment). The difference is $6 per year per $10,000 invested. General information only, not financial advice.
ERTH (Betashares Climate Change Innovation ETF) manages approximately $90.2M and ETHI (Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF) manages approximately $3.6B. Fund size can affect liquidity and bid-ask spreads but does not by itself change the management fee. General information only, not financial advice.
You can hold both, but with approximately 9% estimated holdings overlap the two funds hold mostly different companies, so they can be more complementary. Whether that suits you depends on your own objectives. General information only, not financial advice.
There is no universally right choice — it depends on your goals, time horizon and existing holdings. ERTH charges 0.65% and ETHI charges 0.59%, so ETHI has the lower management fee, and they have approximately 9% estimated holdings overlap. Compare their fees, holdings and sectors above and consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and Target Market Determination. General information only, not financial advice.
General information only.This comparison and the ETFLens tools on this page provide general information about two exchange-traded funds and do not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation or needs. It is not personal financial product or investment advice. ETFLens does not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL). Holdings overlap is estimated from listed top holdings, not full constituent lists, and fee data is sourced from fund manager PDS documents and updated quarterly. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider each fund's Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) and Target Market Determination (TMD), and seek advice from a registered tax agent or licensed financial adviser, before making investment decisions.
Compare another pair
Enter any two ASX ETF tickers to see their side-by-side comparison. General information only.
Compare other ETFs →